[annotator-dev] Annotator 2.0 Docs

[Randall Leeds]

One idea I favor is migrating some wiki content to the gh-pages branch.
While it still adds bulk to the overall repo, it does stay neatly out of
the way while working and is published easily. This branch is already in
use but doesn't contain code  documentation.
On Jan 7, 2014 12:51 AM, "Robert Casties" <casties at mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de>
wrote:

> On 06.01.14 20:18, Randall Leeds wrote:
> > I'm in. Do we want to start putting docs in the source so they can stay
> > more up-to-date? I'm happy to help get the initial tooling sorted out
> and a
> > page written so the pull requests can start coming.
>
> I'm for documentation files in the code repo as long as the
> documentation is plain.
>
> In my digilib project I had the full website in the repo at one time but
> that made the repo too big when you just wanted to get to the code. Then
> I took all documentation out.
>
> Now I put the documentation back in as bare-bones Markdown files and the
> website is built with Maven's site plugin. I guess that would be
> similar to the solution you would use on github.
>
> Cheers
>         Robert
>
> > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Andrew Magliozzi <andrew at finalsclub.org
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hey Nick and company,
> >>
> >> I hope you all had a good holiday break.
> >>
> >> I'm writing to kickstart the documentation for Annotator 2.0.  If anyone
> >> wants to collaborate on this with me, I could certainly use some help.
> >>  @Nick, can you give us some idea of the specific needs for
> documentation
> >> so we can get started.
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Andrew
>
> _______________________________________________
> annotator-dev mailing list
> annotator-dev at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/annotator-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/annotator-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/annotator-dev/attachments/20140107/ede4ad65/attachment-0004.html>