[annotator-dev] Working groups

[Andrew Brookins]

I'm not sure either. Andrew Magliozz sent an email a while ago asking for
working group suggestions, I think in part to create multiple small
meetings instead of another big one because of the 10-participant limit in
Google Hangouts. So my feeling is that it does imply working groups have
their own meetings.

That said, I really enjoyed the big community call. Whether or not working
groups happen, I'm interested in finding some way to host a larger-group
video chat.

Best,
Andrew


On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Randall Leeds <tilgovi at hypothes.is> wrote:

> Sounds good to me.
>
> Not sure what we mean by working group though. Does that just imply we
> have our own meetings?
> On Jan 21, 2014 10:39 AM, "Andrew Brookins" <
> abrookins at safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Would it make sense to form a working group around customizing/extending
>> the editor and form UI? We've had some discussion on the topic and I have a
>> stake in it, so I'd be happy to join.
>>
>> If that topic does not make sense for a small group, please propose
>> alternatives. Or, if a list of groups already exists, can someone link to
>> it? The only one I know about is the documentation working group (clearly
>> important).
>>
>> Best,
>> Andrew
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> annotator-dev mailing list
>> annotator-dev at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/annotator-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/annotator-dev
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/annotator-dev/attachments/20140121/c95423d0/attachment-0004.html>