[annotator-dev] Open Annotation support in Annotator

[Robert Sanderson]

Okay so we should defer that until there's at least some mapping for auth,
that's both easier and consistent :)

R
On Oct 10, 2014 11:53 AM, "Randall Leeds" <tilgovi at hypothes.is> wrote:

> On Oct 10, 2014 11:17 AM, "Robert Sanderson" <azaroth42 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Proposals:
> >
> > 1.  Tags are about the target(s) of the Annotation, and are thus Bodies
> of the annotation.
> >
>
> +1
>
> This is not likely to be terribly wrong for most use, I think. It also
> means we don't need to migrate existing annotations, extracting their tags
> and turning those into second order annotations.
>
> > 2.  User holds the user name of the account, and thus the appropriate
> mapping is foaf:nick
> >
>
> -0
>
> For our use at Hypothesis, the user field is a URI, not a string literal
> representing a foaf:nick.
>
> If I have to override the context document, fine.
>
> But also worth pointing out that without the auth and permissions plugins
> there is no user field. If those components are optional, should the base
> context even include them?
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/annotator-dev/attachments/20141010/408384e1/attachment-0004.html>