[ciência aberta]OER17

Alexandre Hannud Abdo abdo em member.fsf.org
Terça Novembro 22 21:37:19 UTC 2016


Ni! Oi Katia,

Interessante conf, talvez você encontre alguém que vá na comunidade REA:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rea-lista

E legal ver que, mesmo que possa ser por tendência, as discussões de REA
comecem a integrar "hacking, making, gaming, sharing". Um dia ainda se
encontram com a educação democrática (;

Abraço!
l
e
.~´


On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Katia Cuba <katiacccuba em gmail.com> wrote:

> Bom dia,
> Alguém aqui vai participar dessa conferência?
>
> Queria tanto ir num encontro desse! rsrs
> Como temos um curso de português como lingua adicional na plataforma
> moodle, vou convidar a coordenadora!
> Abç
>
>
> https://oer17.oerconf.org/
>
> OER17: The Politics of Open
> 5 & 6 April 2017, Resource for London <http://www.resourceforlondon.org/>,
> UK
>
> OER17 presents an opportunity for open practitioners, activists, educators
> and policy makers to come together as a community to reflect on *The
> Politics of Open*. What are our current key challenges and strengths –
> locally, nationally, and  internationally? What are our priorities – in
> terms of political governance, organisational and personal politics? What
> are the changes that we want to effect together? The conference will be
> chaired by social and educational technologist and Wikimedia UK Trustee
> Josie Fraser, and Alek Tarkowski, Director of *Centrum Cyfrowe*,
> co-founder and coordinator of Creative Commons Poland (find out more
> about our co-chairs
> <http://oer17.oerconf.org/news/meet-the-co-chairs-for-oer17-josie-fraser-and-alek-tarkowski/>
> ).
>
> Conference Themes:
>
>    - Local, national, and international policy and practice
>       - *Cape Town 10th anniversary & 5th anniversary of Paris
>       declaration*
>       - Privacy, surveillance, and open politics
>       - Governance and power
>    - Institutional/organisational politics
>       - Changing cultures
>       - Open in the classroom
>       - Open organisations and organising
>       - From OER to OEP
>    - Participation & social equality
>       - Open as inclusive
>       - Human rights and OER
>       - Digital literacy & open
>       - Children, young people and open education
>    - Open Party
>       - Celebrating wins and progress
>       - Hacking, making, gaming, sharing
>       - Open innovation
>       - Wildcard contributions
>
> The call for proposals is now open
> <https://oer17.oerconf.org/call-for-proposals/>. If you would like to
> stay informed, you can subscribe to email updates from this site using the
> form in the sidebar. If you are interested in supporting this event as a
> sponsor or exhibitor, please contact enquiries em alt.ac.uk.
>
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 20 Nov 2016, at 22:24, Felipe G. Nievinski <fgnievinski em gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Para quem prefere escrever programas do que artigos:
>
> <http://joss.theoj.org/about>
>
> "we recognize that for most researchers, papers and not software are the
> currency of academic research and that citations are required for a good
> career.  We built this journal because we believe that after you've done
> the hard work of writing great software, it shouldn't take weeks and months
> to write a paper about your work."
>
> "The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS) is an academic journal with a
> formal peer review process that is designed to improve the quality of the
> software submitted. Upon acceptance into JOSS, a CrossRef DOI is minted and
> we list your paper on the JOSS website."
>
>
> <http://www.arfon.org/announcing-the-journal-of-open-source-software>
>
> "To be clear, we believe software papers are a nasty hack on a broken
> academic-credit system and that the ideal solution is to move away from
> papers as the only creditable research product.
>
> None of this helps the students/postdocs/early career researchers of today
> who have to make very hard decisions about whether to spend time improving
> the software they've written for their research (and others in their
> community) or whether they should crank out a few papers to make them look
> like a 'productive' researcher.
>
> JOSS exists because we believe that after you've done the hard work of
> writing great software, it shouldn't take weeks or months to write a paper
> about your work."
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blog: http://cienciaaberta.net
> Wiki: http://pt.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Ciência_Aberta
> Chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=cienciaaberta
> Lista cienciaaberta
> cienciaaberta em lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/cienciaaberta
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blog: http://cienciaaberta.net
> Wiki: http://pt.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Ciência_Aberta
> Chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=cienciaaberta
> Lista cienciaaberta
> cienciaaberta em lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/cienciaaberta
>
>
-------------- Próxima Parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/cienciaaberta/attachments/20161122/3cf0b0c0/attachment-0003.html>


Mais detalhes sobre a lista de discussão cienciaaberta