[ciência aberta]OER17

Katia C katiacccuba em gmail.com
Quarta Novembro 23 01:22:41 UTC 2016


Tomara, né?

É, na rea,  obrigada 

🌿Katia C C Cuba
Professora de Literatura e Língua Portuguesa - IFMA
98 988247921


> Em 22 de nov de 2016, às 18:37, Alexandre Hannud Abdo <abdo em member.fsf.org> escreveu:
> 
> Ni! Oi Katia,
> 
> Interessante conf, talvez você encontre alguém que vá na comunidade REA:
> 
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/rea-lista
> 
> E legal ver que, mesmo que possa ser por tendência, as discussões de REA comecem a integrar "hacking, making, gaming, sharing". Um dia ainda se encontram com a educação democrática (;
> 
> Abraço!
> l
> e
> .~´
> 
> 
>> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Katia Cuba <katiacccuba em gmail.com> wrote:
>> Bom dia,
>> Alguém aqui vai participar dessa conferência?
>> 
>> Queria tanto ir num encontro desse! rsrs 
>> Como temos um curso de português como lingua adicional na plataforma moodle, vou convidar a coordenadora! 
>> Abç 
>> 
>> 
>> https://oer17.oerconf.org/ 
>> 
>> OER17: The Politics of Open
>> 5 & 6 April 2017, Resource for London, UK
>> OER17 presents an opportunity for open practitioners, activists, educators and policy makers to come together as a community to reflect on The Politics of Open. What are our current key challenges and strengths – locally, nationally, and  internationally? What are our priorities – in terms of political governance, organisational and personal politics? What are the changes that we want to effect together? The conference will be chaired by social and educational technologist and Wikimedia UK Trustee Josie Fraser, and Alek Tarkowski, Director of Centrum Cyfrowe, co-founder and coordinator of Creative Commons Poland (find out more about our co-chairs).
>> 
>> Conference Themes:
>> 
>> Local, national, and international policy and practice
>> Cape Town 10th anniversary & 5th anniversary of Paris declaration
>> Privacy, surveillance, and open politics
>> Governance and power
>> Institutional/organisational politics
>> Changing cultures
>> Open in the classroom
>> Open organisations and organising
>> From OER to OEP
>> Participation & social equality
>> Open as inclusive
>> Human rights and OER
>> Digital literacy & open
>> Children, young people and open education
>> Open Party
>> Celebrating wins and progress
>> Hacking, making, gaming, sharing
>> Open innovation
>> Wildcard contributions
>> The call for proposals is now open. If you would like to stay informed, you can subscribe to email updates from this site using the form in the sidebar. If you are interested in supporting this event as a sponsor or exhibitor, please contact enquiries em alt.ac.uk.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>> On 20 Nov 2016, at 22:24, Felipe G. Nievinski <fgnievinski em gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Para quem prefere escrever programas do que artigos:
>>> 
>>> <http://joss.theoj.org/about>
>>> 
>>> "we recognize that for most researchers, papers and not software are the currency of academic research and that citations are required for a good career.  We built this journal because we believe that after you've done the hard work of writing great software, it shouldn't take weeks and months to write a paper about your work."
>>> 
>>> "The Journal of Open Source Software (JOSS) is an academic journal with a formal peer review process that is designed to improve the quality of the software submitted. Upon acceptance into JOSS, a CrossRef DOI is minted and we list your paper on the JOSS website."
>>> 
>>> 
>>> <http://www.arfon.org/announcing-the-journal-of-open-source-software>
>>> 
>>> "To be clear, we believe software papers are a nasty hack on a broken academic-credit system and that the ideal solution is to move away from papers as the only creditable research product.
>>> 
>>> None of this helps the students/postdocs/early career researchers of today who have to make very hard decisions about whether to spend time improving the software they've written for their research (and others in their community) or whether they should crank out a few papers to make them look like a 'productive' researcher.
>>> 
>>> JOSS exists because we believe that after you've done the hard work of writing great software, it shouldn't take weeks or months to write a paper about your work."
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blog: http://cienciaaberta.net
>>> Wiki: http://pt.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Ciência_Aberta
>>> Chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=cienciaaberta
>>> Lista cienciaaberta
>>> cienciaaberta em lists.okfn.org
>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/cienciaaberta
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blog: http://cienciaaberta.net
>> Wiki: http://pt.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Ciência_Aberta
>> Chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=cienciaaberta
>> Lista cienciaaberta
>> cienciaaberta em lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/cienciaaberta
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blog: http://cienciaaberta.net
> Wiki: http://pt.wikiversity.org/wiki/Portal:Ciência_Aberta
> Chat: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=cienciaaberta
> Lista cienciaaberta
> cienciaaberta em lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/cienciaaberta
-------------- Próxima Parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/cienciaaberta/attachments/20161122/241cf8f9/attachment-0003.html>


Mais detalhes sobre a lista de discussão cienciaaberta