[ckan-dev] URIs in log messages - overenthusiastic validator?

[Richard Cyganiak]

On 27 Jan 2011, at 16:43, William Waites wrote:
> * [2011-01-27 10:32:46 +0000] Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org> écrit:
> ] Strictly it doesn't but past discussion about reached the consensus
> ] that we could 'abuse' the email field to have a url as well as email.

If describing an idea calls for the word “abuse”, then it's likely a bad one ;-)

> ] Going forward we should perhaps name this 'contact info' (email or
> ] url) ...

I want to provide email *and* URL.

> I would suggest having two fields, mbox and homepage that way
> they are kept clearly separate and there's no confusion...

+1

Richard




> 
> -w
> -- 
> William Waites                <mailto:ww at styx.org>
> http://eris.okfn.org/ww/         <sip:ww at styx.org>
> F4B3 39BF E775 CF42 0BAB  3DF0 BE40 A6DF B06F FD45
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev