[ckan-dev] which html? xhtml4.01Strict vs html 5

Toby Dacre toby.okfn at gmail.com
Mon Apr 30 12:52:00 UTC 2012


On 30 April 2012 13:38, Adrià Mercader <amercadero at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 30 April 2012 12:29, Toby Dacre <toby.okfn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'd like our pages to validate so we should either move over to html5 or
> > remove those features.  moving to html5 is probably the more sensible
> > choice.
> I'd say html 5, of course, but I'm curious to know if this would
> affect rendering and functionality on IE and what version we support.
> I guess that we use some kinf of modernizer framework to fall back to
> when on IE and using this features
>
> > Additionally if we are going to start passing info around like in the
> > example then I'd like us to do it in a uniform way rather than having a
> > whole variety of methods being used.  I think having more data available
> to
> > javascript will be useful but we should try to be consistent.
> That's one for Aron, our new Javascript tsar :)
>

yeah but I rule the html ;p


>
>
> Adrià
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-dev/attachments/20120430/d0fcbc93/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the ckan-dev mailing list