[ckan-dev] release 1.8 merge pull request 93 enable group partial updates

[Toby Dacre]

On 20 August 2012 15:21, Adrià Mercader <adria.mercader at okfn.org> wrote:

> Looks good, I've merged into 1.8 (just running the tests before
> pushing).  Could either Toby or Sean merge / cherry-pick into master
> please?
>

These fixes are now in master

@Adriá

I think we should probably periodically merge the release into master to
ensure all commits in the branch get into master - at least in my
experience of these thing - not sure if others have an opinion - just
ensures things aren't lost

Toby

>
> Regarding the review process I also think that having a single dev
> overseeing the different patches is a good idea, and in general I'm
> happy to do the merges myself, unless I'm busy or it involves some
> more work (like on this case with merging to master). Don't worry
> about sending review requests, I understand that they will increase
> next to the release date, and if I'm busy I'll ask someone else to
> have a look.
>
> One general exception, though: Unless on the final freeze, I'm happy
> for everybody to merge changes on the documentation, as long as it
> builds fine.
>
> Of course all of this depends on the release manager being available
> and around, if for instance we delay 1.8 until next week I won't be
> around, so perhaps we should have a deputy release manager for these
> cases.
>
> Adrià
>
>
>
> On 20 August 2012 09:28, Toby Dacre <toby.okfn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Adriá
> >
> > I'm happy with Sean's pull request for 1.8 and master.  I can do the
> merge
> > into 1.8 if you're happy with that.
> >
> > https://github.com/okfn/ckan/pull/93
> >
> > As a wider discussion on this.  At the moment I'm deferring these to you
> as
> > the release manager so that you are aware of all the late changes/bug
> fixes.
> > Is this working for you or are you just getting over-run with these
> requests
> > and would prefer them to be handled by other people without your
> > involvement?
> >
> > Personally I think it's good to have a single gatekeeper but I am aware
> that
> > there are lots of these late requests flying around.
> >
> > Toby
> >
> > PS you're doing a great job on this
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-dev/attachments/20120820/055818a6/attachment-0001.html>