[ckan-dev] template variables
Toby Dacre
toby.okfn at gmail.com
Thu Jul 26 11:04:58 UTC 2012
On 26 July 2012 11:48, David Read <david.read at hackneyworkshop.com> wrote:
> > I see this as an argument for improving the performance rather than
> hiding the problems behind caching, and it is something that we're looking
> at. If you have any focussed conclusions about specific areas where
> performance is bad it'd great to get your feedback based on the DGU
> experiences of the last few months.
>
> Agreed about working on performance. But I think caching is essential
> too when you have a lot of users to serve.
>
> I'm keen to look at the per-page cache purging code I saw in CKAN, to
> see if that can help us more. Cheers,
>
>
One of the issues we have is that if we set cache-control: public then
proxy servers can cache stuff and we cannot invalidate it
ckan has some internal page caching which can be invalidated. I need to
document it a little more for the 1.8 release in the next few days.
That may help you
> Dave
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-dev/attachments/20120726/7ddbe785/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the ckan-dev
mailing list