[ckan-dev] R: Dpm and DataDeck rewriting. What about ckanclient?

Mon Feb 18 16:52:04 UTC 2013

> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:21:30 +0100
> From: Sean Hammond <sean.hammond at okfn.org>
> Subject: Re: [ckan-dev] R: Dpm and DataDeck rewriting. What about
> 	ckanclient?
> To: ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> Message-ID: <51222ADA.8000607 at okfn.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> 
> > I am committed to develop python-ckanclient around the (beta) APIv3;
> therefore around Action, Search, and Status codes.
> > I will come back to the mailing list when I have got something to show.
> 
> Great to hear.
> 
> Keep in mind that the Action API will no longer be beta in the upcoming CKAN
> 2.0, and also that the CKAN 1.8 Action API docs are out of date.
> There's a pull request for the new Action API docs here, you should follow these
> instead:
> 
> https://github.com/okfn/ckan/pull/358
> 
> In particular, the Search API and Status Codes aren't part of the Action API and
> are going to be come "legacy" APIs. The Action API has package_search and
> resource_search actions instead, and it uses the "success" key in the response
> dict instead of HTTP status codes. It's all in the docs.
> 
> 

Cheers for the link. It is even better for me then, I only focus on the Action APIs.
By the way, is test.ckan.org still working and updated? It is in status 500 since a couple of days.
Would it still be the right place to try the -dev features before they are released? 

--Daniel Graziotin