[ckan-dev] Issue 334 edit related on /app

[Toby Dacre]

On 25 February 2013 23:05, Mark Wainwright <mark.wainwright at okfn.org> wrote:

> >> > Not all related items belong to a dataset, so maybe this should
> change.
> >> > On publicdata.eu <http://publicdata.eu> for example, none of the
> >> > related items on the /apps
> >> > page (also on the front page) belong to a dataset.
> >> >
> >> > so these currently cannot be edited/deleted?  is this the case?
> >>
> >> No, I did a quick test and actually it looks like I can update and
> >> delete them via the api.
> >>
> >> What is the situation with this?  My view is for ckan to be good it
> >> should
> >
> > * allow action via api
> > * allow action via web front end
> >
> > Is the suggestion here that if we can do either route that's good enough?
>
> As I said above, it's not obvious we need to allow these
> not-actually-related related items at all. As no-one's jumped in to
> contradict me, we probably don't need them, in which case I again
> point out that we also don't need to spend time worrying about how to
> handle them.
>

This was a general question about ckan and if we should support both the
api and the web interface or if just one is good enough.
It is not specifically about the initial issue more how ckan should be.


>
> Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-dev/attachments/20130227/c8a08589/attachment-0001.html>