[ckan-dev] Organization/group search

[David Raznick]

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Toby Dacre <toby.okfn at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ira,
>
> About this feature (see brief email conversation below).
>
> a) Am I right in thinking that you want to be able to search for an
> organization on the organizations page?  you example was confusing as it
> was a feature that is already in core.
>
> b) What exactly are we wanting.  My understanding is that currently we do
> not index groups so we would have to do that to get similar functionality
> to the dataset searches.
>
> c) Do we have faceting for groups?  can we tag them at the moment? I don't
> think this is the case.
>
> d) A really crude search of org title and a sort by name asc/desc would be
> easy (but not very feature rich or good) but more complex searching would
> need the indexing.
>

I am happy with the crude search approach, possibly even with an
autocomplete, to help find groups. The need for faceting is really not
essential. The only things to facet on would be custom extras anyway.

I just think we need a way, when there are >30 orgs/groups that people do
not have to page through them all.


>
> e) The indexing approach would possibly take a while as I'm not a solr
> expert - although I have toyed with it a bit recently.  It would probably
> need a fair bit of new code.
>

I think indexing is overkill as there will never be huge amounts of
groups/orgs.

>
> f) If we add this feature it would be available to orgs and groups
>
> I've cc'd dev-list after a quick irc chat with sean
>
> Toby
>
>
>
>>  2. Add search to http://geo.gov.ckan.org/organization [2 days, let us
>>>>> know if there are issues etc]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> when you say add search what do you mean?  I assume you want like on
>>>> http://geo.gov.ckan.org/dataset.  Do you want this also for groups?
>>>> and is this for all ckan instances or just geo.gov?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I think it's worth having this in core. By search - essentially I meant
>>> like here: http://publicdata.eu/group/agriculture where there's a
>>> search bar and relevant (not all) facets pulled from datasets belonging to
>>> the group or org. I'd like the same for groups to keep it consistent and
>>> support anyone who doesn't choose to use orgs.
>>>
>>> cool that's what I was thinking
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-dev/attachments/20130124/a252e553/attachment-0001.html>