[ckan-dev] CKAN Service Provider status?

[Alice Heaton]

On 25/06/14 06:58, Nigel Babu wrote:
> Hi Alice,
>
> I think we never got around to updating it. I'll bring this up in the next dev
> meeting on Thursday to confirm.

Thanks. Having looked at the code, it is clearly work in progress (which 
is what it is advertised as). Given that we only need a subset of the 
functionality (only one type of job, no need for authentication, etc.) 
it will be simpler for us to implement our own service provider. When a 
stable ckan service provider comes along it should be straightforward 
for us to port our code along should we wish to.

Thanks,
Alice

> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 11:54:53AM +0100, Alice Heaton wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> If I want to implement some background tasks in CKAN, is the best
>> approach to implement a separate service based on the CKAN service
>> provider [1], in the same way DataPusher does?
>>
>> I see that the CKAN Service Provider is marked as "work in progress"
>> - though if it's used for the DataPusher I assume it's sufficiently
>> stable?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alice
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/ckan/ckan-service-provider
>> _______________________________________________
>> ckan-dev mailing list
>> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev
> --
> Nigel Babu
> Developer, Open Knowledge
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-dev mailing list
> ckan-dev at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/ckan-dev