[ckan-discuss] Suggestion: better visibility of Ontologies

[Jonathan Gray]

Hi Christopher,

What do you think about the possibility of having a dedicated
'ontologies' group?

  http://ckan.net/group/

Would this make sense? And might you be interested in helping to
establish this? Can you think of anyone else to invite who might be
able to help maintain it? I'd love to help but - I'm afraid its not
really my area. ;-)

If so, you can log in with OpenID and create a new group at:

  http://ckan.net/group/new

All the best,

Jonathan

2010/2/16 Christophe Guéret <christophe.gueret at gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> I received a call from the NeON people to contribute in building this list
> of ontologies : http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Ontology:Main
> This made me think that there is no much visibility for ontologies on CKAN.
> There are some and the only way I found to spot them is to look for the tag
> "ontology".
> Would it make sens to make a distinction between data packages and ontology
> packages on the main page of CKAN ?
> This would help finding ontologies and also would position CKAN as both a
> data catalog and ontology/vocabulary/schema catalog (like schemaweb).
>
> Christophe
>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Christophe Guéret (cgueret at few.vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~cgueret/
> Postdoc working on SOKS (http://www.few.vu.nl/soks)
> Knowledge Representation & Reasoning Group
> Computational Intelligence Group
> Department of Computer Science, AI
> VU University Amsterdam
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-discuss mailing list
> ckan-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-discuss
>
>



-- 
Jonathan Gray

Community Coordinator
The Open Knowledge Foundation
http://blog.okfn.org

http://twitter.com/jwyg
http://identi.ca/jwyg