[ckan-discuss] Suggestion: better visibility of Ontologies

[David Read]

I'd be in favour of getting rid of the ontology tags, now you have the
ontology group. The group works almost exactly like a tag for cross
referencing packages so you only really need one or the other. Of
course groups have the advantage that they have extra metadata and
permissions options, but I see no reason to keep a potentially
confusing duplicate name in the tags.

David

2010/3/12 Christophe Guéret <cgueret at few.vu.nl>:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>> What do you think about the possibility of having a dedicated
>> 'ontologies' group?
>>
>>   http://ckan.net/group/
>>
>> Would this make sense?
>
> What I had in mind was more of a layout thing : on the CKAN homepage create
> two columns, one referencing the latest packages and one for the latests
> update on ontologies. This would have been associated with a distinctions
> between Packages and Ontologies in the menu bar (or some other keywords).
> But the idea of a group is fine. This gives a bit more visibility that just
> tags I guess.
>
>> And might you be interested in helping to establish this?
>
> Done ! I've created a group and added all the packages tagged with
> "ontologies".
> I'm not quite sure on what to do with these tags now. Shall we keep as a
> guidline that every ontology must be tagged as such and added to the group ?
> Or shall the group replace the usage of the tag ?
>
>> Can you think of anyone else to invite who might be
>> able to help maintain it? I'd love to help but - I'm afraid its not
>> really my area. ;-)
>>
>
> I don't have anyone in mind so any volunteer is very welcome ! :-)
>
>
> Cheers,
> Christophe
>
>
> --
> Dr. Christophe Guéret (cgueret at few.vu.nl)
> http://www.few.vu.nl/~cgueret/
> Postdoc working on SOKS (http://www.few.vu.nl/soks)
> Knowledge Representation&  Reasoning Group
> Computational Intelligence Group
> Department of Computer Science, AI
> VU University Amsterdam
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ckan-discuss mailing list
> ckan-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-discuss
>
>