[ckan-discuss] buildbot success in Open Knowledge Foundation on buildbot-test

John Bywater john.bywater at appropriatesoftware.net
Thu Mar 18 20:40:04 GMT 2010

Rufus Pollock wrote:
> cc'ing ckan-discuss ... (Background: we've deployed a buildbot for
> daily automated testing of ckan codebase)
> On 18 March 2010 19:46, John Bywater
> <john.bywater at appropriatesoftware.net> wrote:
>> Phew! So, 47 builds later we've got a green bar. :-)
>> http://buildbot.okfn.org/waterfall
> Good work. By the way how does one get the ckan only set of results
> (for the case where we're testing code other than ckan in the buildbot
> at some future point ...). E.g. can i do:
> http://buildbot.okfn.org/ckan/waterfall

I'm not exactly sure, but I would try creating a build master per 
project (roughly: projects => build masters; platforms => build slaves).


> OK. I agree we don't want >= alone but i'm willing to take a
> reasonable range of versions e.g.:
> Routes>=1.9,<1.11.99
> That said I can see the benefits at least in the "stable" requirements
> of going with a very specific version.

Great. I just set the Routes range like that (it was set at 1.10.3 
because that's what Lenny has). FormAlchemy has >=1.2.3,<=1.3.1. You can 
adjust it if you want. If it doesn't work we'll soon know. :-)

>> Anyway, now it's working, I've switched off the "force rebuild" option in
>> the Web interface (because anybody could do that). Now it's set to run once
>> per day at 0400. Let's see what's in our Inboxes in the morning....
> That's great. I think we probably want a team at ckan.net address here
> (or maybe, to be more precise, team at ckanproject.org ...)

Okay! I'd send it to the -dev list if such a thing existed. I'm sure 
there are plenty of people on ckan-discuss that would find these reports 
annoying (but the thought had crossed my mind).


> Rufus

More information about the ckan-discuss mailing list