[ckan-discuss] CKAN package ID debate

Sean Burlington sean at practicalweb.co.uk
Wed Mar 24 10:27:14 GMT 2010

On 24 March 2010 10:18, William Waites <william.waites at okfn.org> wrote:
> In a similar vein, this has implications for the regular package
> URIs as well. The RDF descriptions we are making refer to the
> http://ckan.net/package/foo and if a name is changed then the
> links are invalidated.

Is it acceptable for URIs in RDF to redirect?

Or does the actual URI used need to return data directly?

(just curious)


Sean Burlington


More information about the ckan-discuss mailing list