[ckan-discuss] CKAN package ID debate

[Sean Burlington]

On 24 March 2010 10:18, William Waites <william.waites at okfn.org> wrote:
>
> In a similar vein, this has implications for the regular package
> URIs as well. The RDF descriptions we are making refer to the
> http://ckan.net/package/foo and if a name is changed then the
> links are invalidated.
>

Is it acceptable for URIs in RDF to redirect?

Or does the actual URI used need to return data directly?

(just curious)

-- 

Sean Burlington

www.practicalweb.co.uk