[ckan-discuss] CKAN package ID debate

Evan King Evan.King at coi.gsi.gov.uk
Wed Mar 24 10:39:47 GMT 2010

> On 24 March 2010 10:18, William Waites <william.waites at okfn.org> wrote:
>> In a similar vein, this has implications for the regular package
>> URIs as well. The RDF descriptions we are making refer to the
>> http://ckan.net/package/foo and if a name is changed then the
>> links are invalidated.
> Is it acceptable for URIs in RDF to redirect?
> Or does the actual URI used need to return data directly?
> (just curious)

I believe URIs in RDF are allowed to redirect (they do on data.gov.uk).

This seems to support that:

Evan King
evan.king at coi.gsi.gov.uk
T: 020 7261 8635
M: 07726628294
Hercules Road

This communication is confidential and copyright.
Anyone coming into unauthorised possession of it should disregard its content and erase it from their records.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by Government Secure Intranet (GSi) virus scanning service supplied exclusively by Cable & Wireless in partnership with MessageLabs.
On leaving the GSI this email was certified virus free.
The MessageLabs Anti Virus Service is the first managed service to achieve the CSIA Claims Tested Mark (CCTM Certificate Number 2006/04/0007), the UK Government quality mark initiative for information security products and services. For more information about this please visit www.cctmark.gov.uk

More information about the ckan-discuss mailing list