[ckan-discuss] CKAN for humans?

[Ed Summers]

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Tim McNamara
<paperless at timmcnamara.co.nz> wrote:
> Does CKAN need to be more accessible to humans? Or is it okay that people
> use other tools?

It's not only OK ... it's in the nature of data publishing on the web.
The fact that people will use other tools should guide the design and
future evolution of CKAN. I'm not entire sure what that means, but I
thought I'd throw it out there :-)

//Ed