[ckan-discuss] CKAN for humans?

[Rufus Pollock]

On 27 April 2011 12:15, Christopher Gutteridge <cjg at ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
> Some time ago I sent quite a long list of suggestions you might use as a
> starting point, the key issue being to consider the poor sod who lands on a
> random CKAN package page, via google. -- they are not very hospitable to
> people who don't actively already understand CKAN.
>
> http://ckan.net/about put me right off.

Let's change it!

> Perhaps Refus still has my brain dump?

Here it is (forwarded by Jonathan):

<http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-discuss/2010-August/000471.html>

On a positive note a fair number (though by no means all) of your
comments have been addressed :-) since last August!

Rufus