[ckan-discuss] datacatalogues.org - editorial policy

Mon Jul 4 14:30:24 BST 2011

Why differentiate and thereby yoke yourselves to the success of one domain? John Sheridan warned the open government data movement of complacency. Needs business case - but also public outcry?

Meanwhile I see no reason to exclude research data catalogues, still Comprehensive?
phone: +441316502973

Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org> wrote:

Yes I think this is purely government data catalogues. Other material shouldn't show up unless an editor/moderator accepts them. I suggest we purge non-government data material - and move to CKAN if appropriate! J. On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Tim McNamara <paperless at timmcnamara.co.nz> wrote: > Is the scope of the project purely government data catalogues? We're already > receiving other material. >_____________________________________________
> ckan-discuss mailing list > ckan-discuss at lists.okfn.org > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-discuss > > -- Jonathan Gray Community Coordinator The Open Knowledge Foundation http://blog.okfn.org http://twitter.com/jwyg http://identi.ca/jwyg_____________________________________________
ckan-discuss mailing list ckan-discuss at lists.okfn.org http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/ckan-discuss 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ckan-discuss/attachments/20110704/9299e22d/attachment.htm>