[datahub-discuss] The DataHub, Organizations and Linked Data cloud
Antoine Isaac
aisaac at few.vu.nl
Thu Oct 24 15:22:19 UTC 2013
Hi Rufus,
Tagging may work for groups like the Library Linked Data one, which indeed was a loosely defined inventory on top of the LOD CLoud group.
But the LOD CLoud group was involving more control and curation. Yet it doesn't "own" datasets... but I won't talk for Richard and Anja further.
Actually, focusing on "ownership" may also create its problems. With all my admiration for work of the OKFN bibliographic data group, it doesn't own The Europeana LOD pilot, so I'd have to create my own organization, and reclaim the Europeana LOD dataset.
Maybe that's more a problem of migrating the existing data. I understand it was certainly not an easy task for you, but understanding why some datasets ended up in some organizations and not others could help. Perhaps it would have been better to just put all existing datasets in the Global organization, create temporary 'group-tags' to allow groups to reconstitute themselves as organizations if they want. And send notifications to admin of datasets and groups. Actually a nudge for the current changes wouldn't hurt, still now!
Cheers,
Antoine
> @Antoine: i'd suggest using tags for straightforward listing and organization structure for more standard "ownership" style setup. I understand this loses a little bit from the group setup but it brings a lot of benefits and reduces conceptual complexity substantially.
>
> Rufus
>
>
> On 23 October 2013 22:38, Antoine Isaac <aisaac at few.vu.nl <mailto:aisaac at few.vu.nl>> wrote:
>
> Hi Ross,
>
> I was not an admin of LOD Cloud, just of Library Linked Data. Perhaps this point is still ok, though I'm not sure (I'll send you my login details offline).
>
> Having datasets in one organization/group is pretty harsh, indeed. It might be hard to attribute some datasets to one group in particular. The Europeana-LOD one is certainly a Library Linked Data one, but it needs to be in the LOD Cloud and for this belong to this group...
>
> For the validator perhaps Anja and Richard will know, and tell me it's my dataset ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I can add you as an admin of lodcloud, it should have happened automatically during the migration, but I obviously screwed up somewhere. Apologies for the inconvenience, it was a pretty hairy migration.
>
> I won’t have time this evening, but I’ll find all of the ones tagged as you suggest and move them into that org. Unfortunately a constraint of the new organisation structure is that datasets can only belong to one organisation. I realise this is pretty harsh, but once we can correctly secure the creation of groups it may be easier to curate them in this way.
>
> If the LOD Cloud Validator is just using the package name to look up the package, it shouldn’t make any difference that it belonge to an organisation. The API response has changed minimally (it has a new field).
>
> Could you email me (offlist) your current datahub.io <http://datahub.io> username? I haven’t touched any of the OpenID stuff so if it was working before it should still be working now - I’ll have to investigate.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ross
>
> On 23 Oct 2013, at 22:03, Antoine Isaac <antoine.isaac at laposte.net <mailto:antoine.isaac at laposte.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is a bottle in the sea... I'm not sure what has happen with thedatahub recently. I apologize if you're already aware of this...
>
> So. There has been a change about Groups, now migrated to organizations
> http://blog.datahub.io/2013/__10/08/organizations-upgrade/ <http://blog.datahub.io/2013/10/08/organizations-upgrade/>
> For example
> http://datahub.io/group/__lodcloud <http://datahub.io/group/lodcloud>
> is also now
> http://datahub.io/__organization/lodcloud <http://datahub.io/organization/lodcloud>
>
> But what has happened to group membership in the process?
>
> I am one of the owners of a group that seems to have shrunk a lot in the process:
> http://datahub.io/group/lld
> (before it was rather like http://datahub.io/dataset?__tags=lld <http://datahub.io/dataset?tags=lld>)
>
> I believe the LOD Cloud group/organization (252 sets now) is also smaller than what it used to be.
>
> In fact I also own a dataset that used to be in the LOD Cloud and the Library Linked Data group:
> http://datahub.io/dataset/__europeana-lod <http://datahub.io/dataset/europeana-lod>
> Now it seems to belong only to one organization, the Bibliography Data one.
>
> I don't know if this could explain why the LOD Cloud validator likes my dataset much less than what it used to:
> http://validator.lod-cloud.__net/validate.php?package=__europeana-lod <http://validator.lod-cloud.net/validate.php?package=europeana-lod>
>
> I'd have investigated further, but the log in has also changed. I was using an MyOpenID one, and this seems to have changed also :-(
>
> Cheers,
>
> Antoine
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> datahub-discuss mailing list
> datahub-discuss at lists.okfn.org <mailto:datahub-discuss at lists.okfn.org>
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/__listinfo/datahub-discuss <http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/datahub-discuss>
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________
> datahub-discuss mailing list
> datahub-discuss at lists.okfn.org <mailto:datahub-discuss at lists.okfn.org>
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/__listinfo/datahub-discuss <http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/datahub-discuss>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *
>
> **
>
> ****
>
> **Rufus Pollock**
>
> **Founder and Executive Director | skype: rufuspollock | @rufuspollock <https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>**
>
> **The Open Knowledge Foundation <http://okfn.org/>**
>
> **Empowering through Open Knowledge**
>
> **http://okfn.org/| @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN>| OKF on Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork>| Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/> | Newsletter <http://okfn.org/about/newsletter>*
>
> *
>
> *
More information about the datahub-discuss
mailing list