[ECODP-dev] catalog record fields
Bert Van Nuffelen
bert.van.nuffelen at tenforce.com
Wed Jul 3 13:10:34 UTC 2013
thanks for the respons.
Are the internal fields queriable?
2013/7/3 John Glover <john.glover at okfn.org>:
> Hi Bert,
> They are different: the 'added to open-data.europa.eu' fields are the
> internal CKAN created/modified dates.
> release_date and modified_date are keys in the dataset JSON object, and as
> mentioned on the call they can be set to any valid date string.
> The semantics from my point of view are basically to allow the PO to enter
> their own dates here based on their own workflow process. These dates are
> then independent of the CKAN database. For example, a dataset 'release date'
> could be set to some value that is before this project even began, if the
> dataset was available somewhere else online. However, you may need to check
> with the PO for clarification.
> On 3 July 2013 12:48, Bert Van Nuffelen <bert.van.nuffelen at tenforce.com>
>> Hi John,
>> to exchange some info on the catalog record fields:
>> the fields release_date & modified_date are EU ODP extensions?
>> I see them in the UI interface, user editable.
>> Are they equal to the fields in the additional information
>> "Added to open-data.europa.eu"
>> "Updated on open-data.europa.eu"
>> If they are different
>> * what are json attributes to get this information
>> * what is the intended semantics from your point of view for the
>> release_date and modified_date fields
>> Bert Van Nuffelen
>> Semantic Technologies Software Architect at TenForce
>> Bert.Van.Nuffelen at tenforce.com
>> Office: +32 (0)16 31 48 60
>> Mobile:+32 479 06 24 26
>> skype: bert.van.nuffelen
>> Ecodp-dev mailing list
>> Ecodp-dev at lists.okfn.org
> Ecodp-dev mailing list
> Ecodp-dev at lists.okfn.org
Bert Van Nuffelen
Semantic Technologies Software Architect at TenForce
Bert.Van.Nuffelen at tenforce.com
Office: +32 (0)16 31 48 60
Mobile:+32 479 06 24 26
More information about the ecodp-dev