[foundation-board] Review of actions from F2F meeting

[Rufus Pollock]

Quick updates.

On 25 August 2010 20:36, Jo Walsh <metazool at gmail.com> wrote:
> ACTION JH: standard contractor contract with explicit non payment terms
> --> to be done when time available

In progress I believe.

> ACTION RP: repository of contracts
> --> Is this something that it would be good for Rufus' PA to help with?
> --> Can these just be attachments to project pages on wiki.okfn.org

In progress. I'm cautious about all such contracts being public (for
grants/agreements with public bodies I agree these should be public).

> ACTION: JH to enquire about project based reports in Xero.
> ACTION: JH to enquire about a review from a professional on the setup of
> Xero
> --> done. Does the board need to do more to make agreement with contractor,
> or can this just go ahead now.

Not convinced what we will get from this person (having looked at her
email). However, plan to have a chat.

> ACTION RP: check with accountant that we are paying HMRC they correct VAT
> payments
> --> Again is this something Rufus' PA can handle?

This has been done. We are now up to date with VAT and have worked out
how to do VAT properly in Xero.

> ACTION JH: to become signatory
> --> Query: if BH is Treasurer then BH should be signatory?
>    Should we amend the minutes to reflect this?

I think BH should be a signatory to. I am looking to get relevant
forms for board meeting next week.

[...]

Rufus