[geo-discuss] Free data 'unacceptable'

[Malte Halbey-Martin]

Well,
unfree geodata are unacceptable for me!

So, can we do soemthing about it anymore or do we have to resign?

asks
Malte

Benjamin Henrion schrieb:
> http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1954152,00.html
>
> "This amends several clauses to take into account "the need to protect
> the financial viability of public authorities, in particular those who
> have a duty to raise revenue". Paragraphs allow member states to
> ensure that Inspire's measures are "feasible and proportionate in
> terms of their likely costs and benefits". Public authorities will be
> allowed to apply charges for "very large volumes of real-time data"
> and suspend access to data as an emergency measure."
>
> -- 
> Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
> FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-4148403
>
> _______________________________________________
> geo-discuss mailing list
> geo-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/geo-discuss
>

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: malte.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/geo-discuss/attachments/20061124/e4f298fb/attachment.vcf>