[kforge-dev] next KForge version
Rufus Pollock
rufus.pollock at okfn.org
Mon Sep 10 18:12:17 UTC 2007
I think you are probably right that this is a better way to go rather
than releasing a bugfix 0.13.1 (or even releasing 'over' the existing
0.13 release files). In this case shall we try and bring forward the
0.14 release date?
~rufus
John Bywater wrote:
> Rufus,
>
> On reflection, I think we should stick to our singular release process,
> go round the release loop again.
>
> I'm fairly sure it would be better if the 0.13 release of KForge should
> remain as documented on the list. And that new changes indicate a new
> release, with release notes to record the changes. Otherwise it will all
> look a bit queer, won't it?
>
> There's no shame in making the scope narrow, to release better quality.
> And anyway, we are sorting a number of things out which haven't been
> thoroughly addressed.
>
> I suggest we calmly create and announce a 0.14 release, which delivers
> improved usability of the plugins, and improves aspects of installation,
> configuration, and documentation. (Super keen people can always use
> trunk.) I think that's a good scope for a minor release. Just cos we
> fixed a few things shouldn't mean we just make a new release. Let's
> finish the work to improve plugins, and when we're ready, release a
> clearly much better version.
>
> But let's not complicate the release process just now. Let's run the
> existing release process again from the top when we've sorted the
> plugins out properly? And in the meantime, either rest, or fix plugins?
>
> What do you think?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> John.
>
>
More information about the kforge-dev
mailing list