[od-discuss] IODL compliance with OpenDefinition.org

[Rufus Pollock]

Seems fine except for point (4) of the conditions which according to
auto-translate reads:

<quote>
take all reasonable steps so that the uses permitted above do not
mislead others and the information in question are not distorted.
</quote>

This is similar to the clause in the UK OGL that we have recently been
discussing -- and so perhaps we defer decision here on the outcome of
that discussion. I note also that this license appears to be
share-alike in nature.

Rufus

On 17 October 2011 18:32, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I believe the IODL is compliant with OpenDefinition.org:
> http://www.formez.it/iodl/
>
> Should we add it here? http://opendefinition.org/licenses/
>
> --
> Jonathan Gray
>
> Community Coordinator
> The Open Knowledge Foundation
> http://www.okfn.org
>
> http://twitter.com/jwyg
>
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
>



-- 
Co-Founder, Open Knowledge Foundation
Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age
http://www.okfn.org/ - http://blog.okfn.org/