[od-discuss] More formal procedure for assessing OpenDefinition.org compliance?

[Rufus Pollock]

On 27 June 2011 10:43, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org> wrote:
> I wonder whether we should have a more formal procedure for assessing
> whether licenses/legal tools are compliant with OpenDefinition.org?
>
> E.g. a monthly bi-monthly review, in which we assess new things and update:
>
> http://www.opendefinition.org/licenses/

Just to follow up (it was cited in a separate thread back in the
Summer) we now have:

<http://opendefinition.org/licenses/process/>

I also agree we probably want to start arranging a bi-monthly or
quarterly meeting to review on these.

Suggest we boot doodle poll to pick a date for a virtual
(skype/etherpad/irc) Advisory Council meeting to review extant
licenses some time in Feb/March.

@Mark: would you be up for coordinating this?

Rufus

> If we do this we'd probably want to draw a big line between 'generic'
> and 'bespoke' options - and to encourage (open) license
> non-proliferation by gradually encouraging people to switch to
> functionally equivalent generic licenses wherever possible?
>
> J.
>
> --
> Jonathan Gray
>
> Community Coordinator
> The Open Knowledge Foundation
> http://blog.okfn.org
>
> http://twitter.com/jwyg
> http://identi.ca/jwyg
>
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss



-- 
Co-Founder, Open Knowledge Foundation
Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age
http://www.okfn.org/ - http://blog.okfn.org/