[od-discuss] OD addendum proposal for dealing with ambiguous license exemptions

[Baden Appleyard]

Sorry, late to this discussion.. +1 to Luis's remarks.




________________
*Baden M Appleyard*
National Programme Director
Australian Governments' Open Access and Licensing Framework (AusGOAL)
Mobile: +61(0)459 824 061
Linkedin: http://au.linkedin.com/in/badenappleyard

AusGOAL
Visit our Website <http://www.ausgoal.gov.au> | Subscribe to our
Blog<http://blog.ausgoal.gov.au> | Join
our LinkedIn Group <http://linkd.in/oq5L3u> | Follow Us on Twitter:
@AusGOAL<https://twitter.com/#!/AusGOAL>


On 16 August 2013 04:40, Luis Villa <luis at lu.is> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Mike Linksvayer <ml at gondwanaland.com>
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Kent Mewhort <kent at openissues.ca>
> wrote:
> >> Comments, wording adjustments, or alternative proposals welcome.  This
> >> addition is more to do with legal access and legal use than the present
> >> actual access, so another option would be to put something similar to
> the
> >> above in it's own section.
> >
> > Right, I need to think about this a bit; other comments welcome. I do
> > like how you've also addressed the work.
>
> I think Kent's suggestion is perfectly fine.
>
> I would like to take this opportunity to note that we're using a
> definition that talks about open works to analyze open licenses. And
> that's a bit messy and something we might want to address in the
> future, by splitting out the definition into two parts:
>
> 1. what defines an open license
>
> 2. what defines an open work
>
> The first criteria for an open work would be "is licensed under an
> open license"; another criteria for an open work would be Kent's "the
> open license is unambiguously applied", etc.
>
> Putting this on the radar-
> Luis
>
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20130819/e01c8753/attachment-0001.html>