[od-discuss] Provincial and Game OGLs; Open Definition 2.0

[Paul Norman]

> From: Wrate, David GCPE:EX [mailto:David.Wrate at gov.bc.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2013 9:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [od-discuss] Provincial and Game OGLs; Open Definition 2.0
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> To my knowledge the OGL license has been adopted by:
> 
> Provinces:
> British Columbia
> Alberta
> Ontario
> 
> Municipalities
> Nanaimo
> Vancouver
> Surrey
> Grande Prairie
> Edmonton
> Toronto
> Ottawa

That is a lot of licenses to have to analyze and compare. I looked at Surrey's
and aside from the different branding, the first line of attribution requirements
uses a "Information Provider(s)" instead of "Information Provider". The OGL 2.0 
(the original UK one) uses the same terms as Surrey. If we do declare a template 
OD-compliant, how are we going to handle cities making changes like this?