[od-discuss] Creative Commons 4.0 BY and BY-SA International

Mon Dec 16 09:02:23 UTC 2013

I'm also +1.

On 13 December 2013 23:57, Luis Villa <luis at lu.is> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Mike Linksvayer <ml at gondwanaland.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > (I have an extended and idiosyncratic review of all of the CC 4.0
> > licenses at http://gondwanaland.com/mlog/2013/12/09/scc-cc-40/ -- other
> > comments aside, I am confident CC-BY-4.0 and CC-BY-SA-4.0 are open and
> > ought be approved, and furthermore will have good effects on the overall
> > open ecosystem -- increasing interoperability, decreasing proliferation,
> > etc.)
>
> As our current rules stand, these are clearly compliant.
>
> [As noted before on this list, I now believe that copyleft in data is
> a mistake; and I think in 5-10 years we'll look back at the
> database-copyleft clause in SA as a well-intentioned effort that
> mostly confused people and decreased interoperability. But that's not
> something currently given to us to judge.]
>
> Luis
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>

-- 

*Rufus PollockFounder and Executive Director | skype: rufuspollock |
@rufuspollock <https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>The Open Knowledge
Foundation <http://okfn.org/>Empowering through Open
Knowledgehttp://okfn.org/ <http://okfn.org/> | @okfn
<http://twitter.com/OKFN> | OKF on Facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> |  Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/>  |
 Newsletter <http://okfn.org/about/newsletter>*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20131216/91820ad4/attachment-0003.html>