[od-discuss] OGL Canada 2.0 conformance decision time

Thu Jul 11 21:29:24 UTC 2013

I added under the heading:

Open licenses only for direct use by a particular entity, eg a
government (it is unlikely the Advisory Council would consider
non-reusable licenses from smaller entities).

Mike

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Levene, Mark
<Mark.Levene at tbs-sct.gc.ca> wrote:
> This is great. Thanks.
>
> One further request: could the definition of a non-reusable licence be added to http://opendefinition.org/licenses/ ? I've been getting some questions as to what that category means. Mike has defined it earlier as: "where other licenses only for direct use by a particular entity (effectively, government, as I doubt we'd even consider such a license from a smaller entity) and its sub-units will be added."
>
> --Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mlinksva at gmail.com [mailto:mlinksva at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mike Linksvayer
> Sent: July-11-13 11:03 AM
> To: Luis Villa
> Cc: Rufus Pollock; od-discuss at lists.okfn.org; Levene, Mark
> Subject: Re: [od-discuss] OGL Canada 2.0 conformance decision time
>
> OGL Canada 2.0 approved as conformant and added to
> http://opendefinition.org/licenses/
>
> Will kick off formal approval-or-lack-thereof for Alberta and BC
> together tomorrow.
>
> Mike
>
> [snip]
>
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss