[od-discuss] [open-government] [Open-data-census] EU Consultation on gov data re-use.

[Mike Linksvayer]

FWIW the questionnaire, direct link at
http://ec.europa.eu/yourvoice/ipm/forms/dispatch?form=PSIguidelines
takes IIRC less than 10 minutes, and some parts are directly relevant
to the Open Definition (eg non-commercial only restrictions
unacceptable).

Open Definition list people, worth filling out if you have time.

Mike

On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Luis Villa <luis at lu.is> wrote:
> It should definitely be of interest, so I am raising it again. However, I am
> skeptical that any of us have time to address it :/
>
> Luis
>
> On Oct 20, 2013 11:24 AM, "Baden Appleyard" <b.appleyard at ausgoal.gov.au>
> wrote:
>>
>> Good question Augusto,
>>
>> Perhaps this is something that might also be of interest to the Advisory
>> Council on the open definition...
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> b
>>
>>
>> ________________
>> Baden M Appleyard
>> Mobile: +61(0)459 824 061
>> Linkedin: http://au.linkedin.com/in/badenappleyard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 16 October 2013 22:57, Augusto Herrmann <augusto.herrmann at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> A month and half later, I can see no further dicussion on this thread on
>>> the mailing lists. Has anyone contributed to or is considering contributing
>>> to the consultation by suggesting a recommendation of standard licences
>>> related to the Open Definition?
>>>
>>> I don't live on the EU, but I think an EU recommendation like this can
>>> influence open data licence decisions elsewhere in the world.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Augusto Herrmann
>>> Open Data Team - Ministry of Planning - Brazil
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Ton Zijlstra <ton.zijlstra at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> The European Commission last Friday has opened a consultation based on
>>>> three questions the new PSI Directive gives the EC a guiding role in.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/consultation-guidelines-recommended-standard-licences-datasets-and-charging-re-use-public
>>>>
>>>> The revised Directive calls on the European Commission to assist the
>>>> Member States in implementing the Directive in a consistent way by issuing
>>>> guidelines on
>>>>
>>>> recommended standard licenses,
>>>> datasets to be released/improved as a matter of priority and
>>>> charging for the reuse of documents.
>>>>
>>>> The objective of the consultation is therefore to seek the views of
>>>> stakeholders on specific issues to be addressed in the 3 sets of guidelines.
>>>>
>>>> I think this is an important consultation, that needs a significant
>>>> input from the wider open data community.
>>>>
>>>> When it comes to licensing and charging, there is I think a significant
>>>> difference between established (commercial) re-users (which are sure to
>>>> respond to the consultation) and 'new' users of data. Innovation, societal
>>>> resilience and grass-roots effort is best served with getting as close to
>>>> the open definition as possible, whereas established players individually
>>>> from their perspective are best served by staying away from the open
>>>> definition: licensing and charging are great ways to put a barrier to entry
>>>> on the low end of your existing market or niche, and thus protecting
>>>> yourself from competition or challengers.
>>>>
>>>> When it comes to prioritizing datasets for release or improvement I, as
>>>> lead editor for the Open Data Census (http://census.okfn.org/), am eager to
>>>> hear your thoughts, and if possible welcome you to the Open Data census
>>>> workshop in 2 weeks at the OK Conference in Geneva
>>>> (http://okcon.org/open-data-government-and-governance/session-d/). To me the
>>>> datasets we currently track are 'infrastructure' (geo, spending, voting,
>>>> company register and such, transport), whereas I suspect that to take on
>>>> certain societal issues different core data sets are needed (healthcare,
>>>> education data, financial system, energy / water, etc).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ton
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Interdependent Thoughts
>>>> Ton Zijlstra
>>>>
>>>> ton at tonzijlstra.eu
>>>> +31-6-34489360
>>>>
>>>> http://zylstra.org/blog
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Open-data-census mailing list
>>>> Open-data-census at lists.okfn.org
>>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-data-census
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> open-government mailing list
>>> open-government at lists.okfn.org
>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-government
>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-government
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> od-discuss mailing list
>> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>