[od-discuss] Open Game License 1.0a for approval

[Kent Mewhort]

+1

On 13-10-16 09:51 PM, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> 10 months later on the last OD call, we agreed to put the Open Game
> License 1.0a http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/ogl.html up for
> approval, with the proviso that it is only Open when no Product
> Identity is identified, and that if approved, will be placed in the
> "Conformant but Little Used, Discontinued or Deprecated Licenses"
> category -- see bottom of http://opendefinition.org/licenses/
>
> + or - votes?
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Mike Linksvayer <ml at gondwanaland.com>
> Date: Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:15 PM
> Subject: re: [od-discuss] Getting the Open Game License accepted under
> the Open Definition
> To: od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> Cc: Chris Sakkas <sanglorian at gmail.com>
>
>
> Months ago Chris Sakkas wrote to this list re the subject
> http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/2012-May/000149.html and I
> didn't see any followup.
>
> I suggest http://www.opengamingfoundation.org/ogl.html *might* be Open
> Knowledge Definition compliant, with the proviso that no "Product
> Identity" is defined (akin to FDL with no invariant sections etc). But
> I'm not at all certain.
>
> This is an old license (2000). It has been discussed thoroughly
> elsewhere, though I don't have a specific reference. Does anyone? Does
> anyone know of important uses free of "Product Identity"?
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>