[od-discuss] v2.0 release

[Aaron Wolf]

> On 05/08/14 10:35 AM, Aaron Wolf wrote:
> >
> > but, the addition of "access" as a value for the OD (which I also
> > support) means that it isn't synonymous with these other things.
> > The other Free / Libre / Open Source terms do not specify anything
> > about the resources being accessible.
>
> A lot of "Open Access" work is NC/nonfree.
>
>
Indeed, but that doesn't mean access isn't an issue. The problem with the
NC  (or ND) Open Access isn't the "Access" part, it's the lack of other FLO
allowances.


> And (to deliberately misunderstand the idea of "access" ;-) ) licenses
> that require publication are nonfree.
>
>
For reference, the Watcom license that requires publication is approved by
OSI but not by FSF. Importantly, our Open Definition doesn't take a clear
position on this. It appears that the only thing clarifying about mandatory
publication of derivatives is whether that is blocked by allowing "free
use."

I think we should consider whether required publication fits the Open
Definition or not. If not, we must add "not require" to the clause about
allowing publication.



> So I agree that access isn't synonymous.
>
>
Perhaps we should say "largely synonymous" or "similar"




> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJT4UCsAAoJECciMUAZd2dZztoH/iiHsJXWUXKfQ8h88XheCXJK
> UUX7FWhYNZ5ssY/btJ2Eb8aNmJTlGATNftAj4nCDbH7Tv1V6DJ2Xy0e/W3W5AH4v
> JlD7YV/KPdQl/LoHm1sWAXlzxmPWO487lct87PIbw2eNO2QIOf+jAW5ZK5Xm+Gn/
> +IeGsCCxdlZor9E6en477rqxJijQgncnub3gminV7s1wKEb16b6DgLBcmoq1hZGF
> OITsHb2AoKID3mDc4qCQ+tWLesBx63JXdr4puWN+jZiuJ4blj+pTi/Iy/gTuGJtR
> qxF7tH36DBaSucEKupbx84BEpoaW1QYi2PgxHNjgRVfFHM4FmplpKBJRAxX3AIY=
> =qnqs
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20140805/d6974d32/attachment-0003.html>