[od-discuss] OD conformant proposal: Open Government Licence v3.0

Fri Oct 17 15:28:44 UTC 2014

Not at all, and I agree it's simpler to simply state it explicitly.

Diane

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Ellis, Jo <
Jo.Ellis at nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:

> Hi Diane
>
>
>
> As you know, we are all about keeping it simple and therefore Andrew's
> suggestion feels more comfortable.  Would that cause you any concerns from
> a licence alignment point of view?
>
>
>
> Jo
>
>
>
> *From:* Diane Peters [mailto:diane at creativecommons.org]
> *Sent:* 17 October 2014 15:39
> *To:* Ellis, Jo
> *Cc:* od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> *Subject:* Re: [od-discuss] OD conformant proposal: Open Government
> Licence v3.0
>
>
>
> Hi Jo,
>
>
>
> The language you propose would seem to preclude use of the URI option if
> there is only one provider.  In our work in the mobile space, the challenge
> of making attribution visible is often raised, so the linking option works
> well.  You might want to consider using the same language used in 4.0
> <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode>, "in any
> reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context…", which we've
> stated (by way of example in the license) allows for attribution by link.  That
> would also align the attribution requirements of our licenses more squarely.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Diane
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Ellis, Jo <
> Jo.Ellis at nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
>
> Further to my email earlier in the week, after further internal
> discussions relating to the attribution stacking question, we are proposing
> to add the following in to the attribution requirement section of the
> OGLv3.0 in order to address the "onerous" point raised earlier:
>
>
>
> If you are using Information from several Information Providers and
> listing multiple attributions is not practical in your product or
> application, you may include a URI or hyperlink to a resource that contains
> the required attribution statements.
>
>
>
> I've updated the licence at
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C3jPK5U61GU6hMmrEQHJ-TuC8MVPn8ngodlexlQsuRk/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
> I look forward to hearing from you all.
>
>
>
> Jo
>
>
>
>
>
> Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>  National Archives Disclaimer
>
>  This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the
>
> individual(s) to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient and
>
> have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete the email.
>
> Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do
>
> not relate to the official business of The National Archives are neither given nor
>
> endorsed by it.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Diane M. Peters
>
> General Counsel, Creative Commons
>
> Portland, Oregon
>
> http://creativecommons.org/staff#dianepeters
>
>
> This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus
> service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM
> Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your
> organisations IT Helpdesk.
> Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or
> recorded for legal purposes.
>
>
> Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> National Archives Disclaimer
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the use of the
> individual(s) to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient and
> have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete the email.
> Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message and attachments that do
> not relate to the official business of The National Archives are neither given nor
> endorsed by it.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>

-- 
Diane M. Peters
General Counsel, Creative Commons
Portland, Oregon
http://creativecommons.org/staff#dianepeters
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20141017/56de0d73/attachment-0003.html>