[od-discuss] Fwd: Conformance - Open Government License - Surrey 1.0
herb at dynamic-solutions.com
Mon Apr 20 15:51:58 UTC 2015
As promised, I have drafted a letter to the City of Surrey regarding the
Open Government License - Surrey 2.0 approval. I plan to send this out on
Friday of this week.
I have included a section to raise our concern over the confusion for
people publishing works based on the license. Please review and feel free
to comment / edit.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Mike Linksvayer <ml at gondwanaland.com> wrote:
> On 03/07/2015 03:10 PM, Herb Lainchbury wrote:
> > Mike said:
> > "I propose in the comments on OGL Canada we add...
> > Note several Canadian provinces and municipalities have developed
> > non-reusable licenses, each with differences from the federal OGL
> > Canada. Some of these are open, as noted on a [dedicated
> > page](/licenses/ogl-canada-subnational)."
> > I agree. +1
> I went ahead and implemented this as Surrey 2.0 has been approved. Over
> my dead vote. ;-)
> Next to the Surrey 2.0 entry I linked to the archived email stating that
> approval was obtained.
> If anyone wants to do some web maintenance work, I think it'd be great
> to find corresponding to approval of each of the licenses on
> http://opendefinition.org/licenses/ and link them.
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
Herb Lainchbury, Dynamic Solutions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the od-discuss