[od-discuss] Open Definition Telecon 15:00 UTC Thursday 2015-02-12

Thu Feb 12 16:29:16 UTC 2015

Apologies for missing the call today.

I noted one detail I wanted to clarify about in OD 2.1:

"The license may require that modified versions of a licensed work carry
a different name or version number from the original work or otherwise
indicate what changes have been made."

Do we really want "what" in "what changes have been made" and not "that"?

Or should we say both? I think the requirement THAT changes have been
made is more essential, and I worry that WHAT could be onerous but I'm
not sure…

Aaron

On 02/12/2015 06:27 AM, Herb Lainchbury wrote:
> Reminder, our OD AC meeting is thirty minutes from now - Thursday,
> February 12th at 15:00 UTC.
> 
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Herb Lainchbury
> <herb at dynamic-solutions.com <mailto:herb at dynamic-solutions.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hello All,
> 
>     Our next meeting is Thursday the 12th of February 2015 at 15:00 UTC.
> 
>     That's:
>     0700 San Francisco
>     1000 New York
>     1500 London
>     1600 Berlin
> 
>     other time zones: 
> 
>     http://www.worldtimeserver.com/convert_time_in_UTC.aspx?y=2015&mo=2&d=12&h=15&mn=0
> 
> 
>     We will be discussing:
>     * OD 2.1
>     * IMF license for data re-use
>     * recommendations to Surrey
>     * licenses waiting for assessment
>     * license approval process and communications
>     * open data and APIs
> 
>     Please edit agenda and notes at:
>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1t1_2_T-PeprvkLVwum5fY-od1hecUowFwaRvuQwDLNw
> 
>     Notes from previous call can be found here: 
>     _http://opendefinition.org/2015/01/27/notes-from-open-definition-call-december-2014/_
> 
>     Thanks,
>     Herb
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> od-discuss mailing list
> od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss
> 