[od-discuss] OGL Surrey 1.0 - decision time

[Andrew Stott]

-1 for the same reason as Mike.

 

From: od-discuss [mailto:od-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of Mike Linksvayer
Sent: 08 January 2015 18:15
To: Herb Lainchbury
Cc: od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
Subject: Re: [od-discuss] OGL Surrey 1.0 - decision time

 

-1

 

https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/2014-November/001155.html for why

 

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:03 AM, Herb Lainchbury <herb at dynamic-solutions.com> wrote:

I believe we've discussed the OGL Surrey v1.0 sufficiently to assess conformance.

 

I now request that advisory council members indicate whether they agree that the license conforms to section 2 of the open definition (v2.0) found here:

 

http://opendefinition.org/od/

 

 

Please use +1 for agree and -1 for disagree.

 

 

You can find a discussion here:

https://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/2014-November/001133.html

 

 

You can find the text for the license here:

 

OGL Surrey v1.0

http://data.surrey.ca/pages/open-government-licence-surrey

 

 

 

We will continue counting votes for two weeks from now or until consensus is reached, which ever is first.

 

-- 

 

Herb

 

 


_______________________________________________
od-discuss mailing list
od-discuss at lists.okfn.org
https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/od-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/od-discuss

 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20150108/94fac2e0/attachment-0003.html>