[od-discuss] OGL Surrey 1.0 - decision time

[Herb Lainchbury]

Yes, I think it would be very useful for the other parties whose licenses
exhibit the same issues.

I know many of them would appreciate the feedback and would find specific
recommendations useful in moving forward.

Thanks Paul.
H

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 9:51 AM, Paul Norman <penorman at mac.com> wrote:

> On 1/20/2015 9:49 AM, Herb Lainchbury wrote:
>
>> Apologies.  You're right.  Since we have rejections the vote would need
>> at least 75% to pass, and that's no longer possible with the current number
>> of rejections.
>>
>> The license is rejected.
>>
>> I will start a recommendations letter for Surrey and will share it here.
>>
> Can this recommendation be extended to the Vancouver, Nanaimo, and BC OGL
> variants, or do they need to be considered separately?
>



-- 

Herb Lainchbury, Dynamic Solutions
250.704.6154
http://www.dynamic-solutions.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/od-discuss/attachments/20150120/58ba5479/attachment-0003.html>