[ok-scotland] Cities and open data

Tue Jan 27 16:18:38 UTC 2015

Hi – we wouldn’t be asking for individual records. It would be aggregated up to LA level with names etc. removed

From: ok-scotland [mailto:ok-scotland-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of Alex.Ramage at transportscotland.gsi.gov.uk
Sent: 27 January 2015 16:07
To: ok-scotland at lists.okfn.org
Subject: Re: [ok-scotland] Cities and open data

Just to put my two pence.

Some of your data is extremely sensitive – you may wish to be more open in the level of aggregation you are expecting.  You do not have (and will never have I hope) permission to view my PAYE records!

__________________________________________________
[Title: Transport Scotland logo]<http://www.transportscotland.gsi.gov.uk/>
Alexander D. Ramage
Head of Management Information Systems
Asset Management
Trunk Road and Bus Operations

T: 0141 272 7281
T: 0131 244 5484
Blackberry: 07920 477 576

Transport Scotland
Buchanan House
58 Port Dundas Road
Glasgow
G4 0HF

For agency and travel information visit our website<http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/>
__________________________________________________

Transport Scotland, the national transport agency
Còmhdhail Alba, buidheann nàiseanta na còmhdhail

From: ok-scotland [mailto:ok-scotland-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of Maire Williams
Sent: 27 January 2015 16:04
To: List for those interested in open knowledge in Scotland.
Subject: Re: [ok-scotland] Cities and open data

Thanks Dave.

For this particular piece of work we are looking at data sets that are already collected but are not publically available. In part this is because we feel there is a stronger case for releasing them – there are no additional collection costs as the data is already held. All the data listed in table 1 of the document I attached is currently collected by Government but is not open to the general public. These are not taken from a particular list that cities publish, just from our general knowledge of data collection and/or conversations with organisations.

So we’re not looking for suggestions on data that organisations should start to collect but suggestions for existing datasets that it would be useful to have publically and freely available. We also want  to gauge the level of support for existing data that Centre for Cities feels should be prioritised for release i.e. would others use this data if published and how.

Hopefully that’s clearer!

Thanks,
Maire

From: ok-scotland [mailto:ok-scotland-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of David Stafford
Sent: 27 January 2015 14:58
To: ok-scotland at lists.okfn.org<mailto:ok-scotland at lists.okfn.org>
Subject: Re: [ok-scotland] Cities and open data

Hello Maire,

Can I just interject, one thing I did not see in your list, which is - what the proviso would be in a situation where you identify your "list of key data sets that we (you) and others would like to see prioritised for release" what is the proviso, when one or more of the desired data sets simply does not exist at some, many, or even all of the cities in question - or, are you talking about choosing from lists of existing datasets already published by these cities (which, if I had to guess - mostly do not exist???).

I just wondered - I think it's an important point, you can't easily prioritise something that literally does not exist :-)  - as you know.

So I personally, would have written this list:

1)      If the specific datasets mentioned would be of interest to you / your organisation and how you would use them

2)      Other city level data you / your organisation would like to see prioritised for release and why

This way, instead:

1)         Does this information exist at the city level in the 64 cities we are interested in?  If not, how will we proceed for items / data sets that we want, but, that do not exist?

2)         If the specific datasets mentioned would be of interest to you / your organisation and how you would use them?

3)        Other city level data you / your organisation would like to see prioritised for release and why - again, if extant?

Just a thought, I could be way off the mark, and if I am - my apologies.

I would never assume that data is there, unless you've checked - in which case, then it's just not clear in the email that you are working from a list of existing data sets.

All the very best,

Dave Stafford

>>> Maire Williams <M.Williams at centreforcities.org<mailto:M.Williams at centreforcities.org>> 27/01/2015 13:54 >>>
Hi all,

I’ve just joined this mailing list and wanted to introduce myself and ask for feedback on a project I’m working on. I work as a researcher at Centre for Cities, which looks at the economic performance of the UKs 64 largest cities. We’re interested in open data as the amount of timely, robust data available at a city level is limited, and this impacts on our and Governments ability to understand the issues individuals cities face and develop efficient policies that overcome these. We published a report outlining the benefits from open data policies to cities  (http://www.centreforcities.org/publication/open-data-or-closed-doors/) and are now building on this to come up with a list of key data sets that we and others would like to see prioritised for release.

I’ve attached a short note that outlines what data we would like to see prioritised for release and why. It would be great if you could have a read through and get back to me with comments on:

1)      If the specific datasets mentioned would be of interest to you / your organisation and how you would use them

2)      Other city level data you / your organisation would like to see prioritised for release and why

Our aim is to come up with a short list of key data sets that we would then campaign for the relevant parties to release.

Any feedback you have would be appreciated,

Many thanks,
Maire

Maire Williams
Researcher
@WilliamsMaire<https://twitter.com/WilliamsMaire>
Centre for Cities, Enterprise House, 59-65 Upper Ground, London. SE1 9PQ

Visit us: centreforcities.org<http://www.centreforcities.org/> | Follow us: @centreforcities<http://twitter.com/centreforcities> | Data about your city: citiesoutlook.org<http://www.citiesoutlook.org/>
Our General Election campaign, Think Cities: thinkcities.org.uk<http://www.thinkcities.org.uk/> or follow: @thinkcitiesuk

Centre for Cities is a registered charity (No 1119841) and a company limited by guarantee registered in England (No 6215397)

******************************************************************

This email and any attachments are intended solely for the individual or

organisation to which they are addressed and may be confidential and/or

legally privileged.  If you have received this email in error please

forward it to servicedesk at stirling.gov.uk<mailto:servicedesk at stirling.gov.uk> and then delete it.

Please check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses

as Stirling Council accepts no liability for any harm caused to the

addressees' systems or data.  Stirling Council may monitor its email system.

Stirling Council accepts no liability for personal emails.

This email was scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisations IT Helpdesk.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.

*********************************** ********************************

This email has been received from an external party and

has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.

********************************************************************

**********************************************************************

This e-mail (and any files or other attachments transmitted with it) is intended solely for the attention of the addressee(s). Unauthorised use, disclosure, storage, copying or distribution of any part of this e-mail is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient please destroy the email, remove any copies from your system and inform the sender immediately by return.

Communications with the Scottish Government may be monitored or recorded in order to secure the effective operation of the system and for other lawful purposes. The views or opinions contained within this e-mail may not necessarily reflect those of the Scottish Government.

Tha am post-d seo (agus faidhle neo ceanglan còmhla ris) dhan neach neo luchd-ainmichte a-mhàin. Chan eil e ceadaichte a chleachdadh ann an dòigh sam bith, a’ toirt a-steach còraichean, foillseachadh neo sgaoileadh, gun chead. Ma ’s e is gun d’fhuair sibh seo le gun fhiosd’, bu choir cur às dhan phost-d agus lethbhreac sam bith air an t-siostam agaibh, leig fios chun neach a sgaoil am post-d gun dàil.

Dh’fhaodadh gum bi teachdaireachd sam bith bho Riaghaltas na h-Alba air a chlàradh neo air a sgrùdadh airson dearbhadh gu bheil an siostam ag obair gu h-èifeachdach neo airson adhbhar laghail eile. Dh’fhaodadh nach eil beachdan anns a’ phost-d seo co-ionann ri beachdan Riaghaltas na h-Alba.

**********************************************************************

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ok-scotland/attachments/20150127/ae0a056e/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 48308 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ok-scotland/attachments/20150127/ae0a056e/attachment-0006.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9369 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/ok-scotland/attachments/20150127/ae0a056e/attachment-0007.png>