[okfn-br] Internal debate about legitimacy, accountability, responsiveness, transparency, etc...

[Carolina Rossini]

Acho esses materiais podem ser uteis para nos na OKF-br

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Becky Lentz, PhD" <roberta.lentz em mcgill.ca>
Date: Jun 9, 2014 7:12 AM
Subject: [bestbits] Internal debate about Best Bits' legitimacy,
accountability, responsiveness, transparency, etc...
To: "BestBits" <bestbits em lists.bestbits.net>
Cc:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> I'm wondering if the benchmarks of good practice put forward by OneWorld
> Trust (see the attached assessment they did this year of ICANN's
> performance
>
https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/benchmarks-consultancy-28feb14-
> en.pdf) on the following might be useful to this discussion and also to
> the new steering committee's work?
>
> -Accountability Strategy
> -Transparency
> -Board Governance (i.e., Steering Committee)
> -Participation
> -Responsiveness of the Executive Body
> -Evaluation and Learning
> -Complaints and Response Mechanisms
>
> The report link above incorporates the following four standard setting
> initiatives¹ accountability framework because of their international,
> cross-sectoral focus, and wide recognition by non-profit organisations
> worldwide:
>
> €       The Global Accountability Framework II (One World Trust)
> €       Code of Ethics for NGOs (World Association of NGOs)
> €       INGO Accountability Charter (INGO Charter Company)
> €       The 2010 HAP Standard in Accountability and Quality Management
> (Humanitarian Accountability Partnership)
>
> Best,
> Becky
>
-------------- Próxima Parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-br/attachments/20140609/d0d0c0cf/attachment-0004.html>