[okfn-br] [OKFN-Local-Coord] [okfn-discuss] Suggestion: OKCentral henceforth be called OKGlobal
Denis Parfenov
denis.parfenov em openknowledge.ie
Sábado Setembro 20 21:59:03 UTC 2014
+1 for OK International. OKI for short - perfect ;-)
On 20 September 2014 22:08, alberto abella <alberto.abella em okfn.es> wrote:
> +1 OK international
>
>
> On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 17:27 +0100, Irina Bolychevsky wrote:
>
> I'm +1 on OKInternational and it can be OKI for short :)
>
>
>
> Ira
>
>
> On 17 September 2014 20:15, Everton Zanella Alvarenga <tom em okfn.org.br>
> wrote:
>
> Naomi and all,
>
>
> these observations are good. I like best the idea of *Open Knowledge
> Internation* (*OKInternational*) instead. Already used this name in an
> e-mail I just sent in another conversation. I'll use OKInternational, but
> sure will listen to other ideas to come until we find a consensus. :)
>
>
> P. S. If someday we discover intelligent life in other planets, I
> suggest change to Open Knowledge Universal, if there isn't one already or
> planets where we don't need to open up knowledge created by these exotic
> aliens.
>
>
> P. P. S. At the university I've studied, University of São Paulo, at
> the Clock Square it is written "In the universe of culture the center is
> everywhere
> <http://obasculante.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/foto-reloj-usp.jpg>",
> said by Miguel <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_Reale>Reale
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_Reale>. I'd say the same for the
> commons of knowledge. :)
>
>
> Tom
>
>
> 2014-09-17 9:58 GMT-03:00 Naomi Lillie <naomi <naomi.lillie em okfn.org>.
> <naomi.lillie em okfn.org>lillie <naomi.lillie em okfn.org>@
> <naomi.lillie em okfn.org>okfn <naomi.lillie em okfn.org>.org
> <naomi.lillie em okfn.org>>:
>
> Hi Tom & all,
>
>
>
> Interesting! Personally, I am in two minds about this.
>
>
>
> To me, calling the non-profit organisation 'Open Knowledge Global'
> implies we would then speak for all the global groups, as a sort of
> collective or overall representative of all the individual Chapters, Local
> Groups, Working Groups and other community groups and individuals. As you
> know, this may not always be appropriate - different groups have different
> aims and methods, and - for example - if 'Open Knowledge Global' were to
> write a thought-leadership blog on successful lobbying, that could damage
> the reputation of groups in areas where lobbying is perceived as anarchic
> or subversive. 'Central' seems more representative of a supportive
> administrative hub, which I would say is closer to my understanding of the
> role the non-profit organisation currently undertakes, or seeks to
> undertake.
>
>
>
> On the other hand, I agree there isn't a 'centre' of Open Knowledge
> (if there is, I want the key!!). The non-profit organisation doesn't
> dictate what groups do or say, the lines of communication aren't radiating
> out from a centre, the groups aren't gathered 'around the centre'; 'global'
> allows for a more amorphous cloud of multiple communication streams, and
> less hierarchy. Also being called 'OKCentral' has sometimes given the
> impression that the most usual geographic location for OKCentral to meet -
> London, Berlin or Cambridge - is therefore its 'capital' or office. in the
> case of London and Cambridge, this is exacerbated by the fact that there is
> no established Local Group, and many people assume 'OKCentral' is the same
> as 'OK-UK' or 'OK-England'. 'Global' may go some way to address this
> misconception and/or help us move away from this habit.
>
>
>
> There are examples of other organisations and communities being called
> 'international' - for example Amnesty International and Greenpeace
> International - perhaps people involved in those groups could share
> information about what the 'international' there implies and means in
> practise, and we could see whether that model fits with what we all are or
> hope to be?
>
>
>
> I would love to hear more from people on this list about what you
> think and/or have experienced, as well as Local Group and Working Group
> leaders - here looping in on CC.
>
>
>
> Thanks Tom for the thought-provoking suggestion!
>
>
>
> Naomi (speaking for myself only)
>
>
>
>
> On 16 September 2014 16:02, Julio Feliciano <julio em sfsu.edu> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
> On Sep 15, 2014, at 11:36 PM, Nurunnaby Hasive <nh em nhasive.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> +1
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Pieter Colpaert <
> pieter.colpaert em okfn.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Op 15 sep. 2014 13:18 schreef "Rufus Pollock" <
> rufus.pollock em okfn.org>:
>
>
> Very good suggestion Tom - we sort of fell into the "Central" by
> accident (btw it was always intended to convey coordination and support
> rather than direction).
>
>
>
> If others were happy with the "Global" moniker rather than
> "Central" I think this would make perfect sense as a change.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Rufus
>
>
> On 13 September 2014 16:12, Everton Zanella Alvarenga <
> tom em okfn.org.br> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
> I believe for we work as a network, we shouldn't have a center.
> Thus I'd like to suggest henceforth to call Open Knowledge Central of Open
> Knowledge Global (OKCentral -> OKGlobal). And we work hard to work in this
> way.
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> Tom
>
>
> --
>
> Everton Zanella Alvarenga (also Tom)
>
> Open Knowledge Brasil - Rede pelo Conhecimento Livre
> http://br.okfn.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss em lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> *Rufus Pollock*
>
> *Founder and President | skype: rufuspollock |@rufuspollock
> <https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>*
>
> *Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/>** - s**ee how data can change
> the world*
>
> *http://okfn.org/ <http://okfn.org/> | @okfn
> <http://twitter.com/OKFN> | Open Knowledge on Facebook
> <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> | **Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/>*
>
>
> The Open Knowledge Foundation is a not-for-profit organisation.
> It is incorporated in England & Wales as a company limited by guarantee,
> with company number 05133759. VAT Registration № GB 984404989.
> Registered office address: Open Knowledge Foundation, St John’s Innovation
> Centre, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WS, UK.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss em lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss em lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-local-coord mailing listokfn-local-coord em lists.okfn.orghttps://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-local-coord
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-local-coord
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-local-coord mailing list
> okfn-local-coord em lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-local-coord
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-local-coord
>
>
--
Denis Parfenov
Open Knowledge Ambassador / Open Knowledge Ireland, Co-Founder
https://openknowledge.ie/ | Google+
<https://plus.google.com/u/0/communities/106119681022861607353>
*'Open minds to open actions'*
m: +353863850044 | @prfnv <https://twitter.com/prfnv> [.org
<http://prfnv.org/>]
-------------- Próxima Parte ----------
Um anexo em HTML foi limpo...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-br/attachments/20140920/5fd3444d/attachment-0005.html>
Mais detalhes sobre a lista de discussão okfn-br