[okfn-br] Convite Planejamento OKBr 2016

Quarta Junho 22 17:11:50 UTC 2016

Olá Pessoal,

O relatório do mês passado, já foi enviado para o Tom, Ariel e a Heloisa.

Segue em anexo para todos. Vocês tem alguma recomendação para onde
nossa equipe deve direcionar os próximos relatórios ?

Abs,
-Thiago Rondon

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Ariel Kogan <ariel em ok.org.br> wrote:
> Muito obrigado Tom!
> Thiago, por favor enviar os relatórios desde que você assumiu o projeto.
> Helô, em relação a adiar esse encontro de planejamento, prefiro manter para
> o Tom conseguir participar (ele viaja para Europa no dia 26). Acredito que
> ele tem muito para contribuir, principalmente com o histórico de projetos,
> parceiros, entre outros.
> Se for necessário, podemos marcar outra data em Julho.
> Abraços!
> Ariel
>
> Em 21 de jun de 2016 11:59 AM, "Everton Zanella Alvarenga" <tom em ok.org.br>
> escreveu:
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-06-20 12:30 GMT-03:00 Heloisa Pait <heloisa em ok.org.br>:
>>>
>>>
>>> Para mim a prioridade é saber em que pé está, concretamente, o Gastos
>>> Abertos.
>>
>>
>> Concepção inicial do projeto:
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_PtWGm7oGgY8JY0IOcrIWnVxbxis0aB9rHWdL5U7ZpM
>>
>> Alguns dos relatórios iniciais repetidas vezes enviados:
>>
>> - Hitórico resumido (dezembro 2014 a abril 2015):
>> https://github.com/okfn-brasil/documents/blob/master/gastos_abertos/gastos_abertos_historico.md
>> - Relatório (abril 2015):
>> https://github.com/okfn-brasil/documents/blob/master/gastos_abertos/gastos_abertos.md
>>
>> - Organização do que havia sido feito num documento enxuto:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PbIXwJPhREFYoYuUftyTW8zwC03bp-GfSkPeTKEx_rE/edit
>>
>> Os novos relatórios:
>>
>> - Relatório enviado para o financiador (março 2016):
>> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5Uf8J2NlhindFFzTEpMSmhZMWM
>>
>>
>> Respostas a alguns questionamentos do último relatório.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Edward Y. Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you again for following up on this. I’ve touched base with my
>>> colleague Tanya Pham and had a moment to review your reports. The next step
>>> would be for me to forward the reports to the Google team and recommend
>>> release of your next grant payment. HOWEVER, before I can do that, I have a
>>> few questions regarding your reports.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1.       Can you elaborate on why you changed your strategy, to shift
>>> your effort and spread the work to other Brazilian cities? Is it because
>>> you’ve exhausted all access to data in Sao Paulo, or are you trying to get
>>> better data representation by replicating the work in other cities?
>>
>>
>> We had been working mostly with São Paulo city data. After working with
>> this data (spending stories <http://gastosabertos.org/historias/>, courses
>> <http://gastosabertos.org/blog/tags/escola_de_dados/>, APIs
>> <http://api.gastosabertos.org>  and data scrapping and analysis), we
>> realised it's not sustainable to keep this work of searching all data for
>> two main reasons: 1. the costs to analyse and work with the actual data is
>> higher than we expected and  2. some of the data used on our spending
>> stories took longer to have an answer from the public bodies through our
>> access to information law.
>>
>> Mainly for these reasons, we are moving forward to a strategy of building
>> key partnerships to bring data to our platform (CKAN for budget data and
>> automatic API), and our guides, build upon our previous experience, will
>> provide means for these local brigades to work on budget and spending data
>> doing tasks similar to what we have done so far.
>>
>> Regarding the partnership, in October we'll have local elections, so we
>> will reach several mayor candidates around the country to sign a commitment
>> letter to use our budget data platform sending us this data. For that, we
>> are working with the NGO Rede Nossa São Paulo
>> <http://www.nossasaopaulo.org.br/>, that has a huge experience in doing this
>> kind of work.
>>
>>>
>>> 2.       Was there any delay in meeting your objectives for Year 1? If
>>> so, why? I ask because your report was due in September 2015 and was
>>> submitted in March 2016.
>>
>> Yes, there were some delay on our deliverables and the main reasons were:
>> 1. it took more time that we expected to analyse the data and build our
>> products (API, searching platform for contracts, data visualizations) and 2.
>> as we have predicted for the project risks, it took longer than expected to
>> have access to some data of our spending stories, even our journalist and
>> team using our (recent in Brazil) access to information law.
>>
>> As for the report, I was reporting all our progress and challenges of the
>> project mothly to the consulting firm Google hired to support and follow our
>> work (they had direct contact with Google.org), so I believed everything
>> regarding this was fine. I tried to find this initial letter Tanya sent me
>> with this award letter, templates and dates for the report, but I didn't
>> find it. This award letter was actually one thing I've asked in 2014 for the
>> bank to accept the wire transfer of the first isntalment, but I've never
>> received, hence taking 2 more months for we begin to spend the grant (it
>> actually started in November 2014).
>>
>> Since last November I've also asked to googlers in touch of us the the
>> consulting firm support who should I talk to about the second instalment,
>> but I never got an answer, until Tanya's e-mail here.
>>
>> --
>> Everton Zanella Alvarenga
>> Open Knowledge Brasil
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> okfn-br mailing list
>> okfn-br em lists.okfn.org
>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-br
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-br
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-br mailing list
> okfn-br em lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-br
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-br
>
-------------- Próxima Parte ----------
Um anexo não-texto foi limpo...
Nome: Relato?rio de entrega - Gastos Abertos.pdf
Tipo: application/pdf
Tamanho: 112651 bytes
Descrição: não disponível
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-br/attachments/20160622/accff0f0/attachment-0005.pdf>