[okfn-discuss] Taking the Open Service Definition to 1.0

[David Joyner]

On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 12:55 PM, Evan Prodromou <evan at prodromou.name> wrote:
> Luis Villa wrote:
>> Do we have anyone actually using the definition yet? I'm always
>> reluctant to call things 1.0 until they've had significant amounts of
>> rubber-meeting-road.
>>
> Using it for what?
>
> Also, I'd throw in my vote for "Open Network Service Definition" (ONSD),
> which is close to OSDN but not confusingly so. However, it does use two
> appositive nouns, which can be a little hairy (is it a definition for
> open network services, or a service definition for open networks?).

I agree. Open Service is not very specific. I vote for "Open Network
Service ... " or
"Open Web Service ... ".

>
> -Evan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
>