[okfn-discuss] Fwd: Lessig, Zuckermann et al. on transparency

[Jonathan Gray]

I thought this thread might be interesting to list members!

The main argument from Lessig, it seems to me, is that transparency in
itself is not unconditionally a good thing (of course!). The crux of
the argument is that while the transparency lobby may focus on the
corrupting influence of money (which confirms the public's suspicion
that political decisions follow money, and can do more harm than good)
- we should spend more time reforming our public institutions, e.g.
push for publicly funded elections.

  http://www.tnr.com/print/article/books-and-arts/against-transparency

Jonathan


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: eleonora panto <eleonora.panto at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:16 AM
Subject: [eups2.0] Lessig, Zuckermann et al. on trasparency
To: eups20 at googlegroups.com


Surely, you already read these:

Lessig: Against Transparency
http://www.tnr.com/print/article/books-and-arts/against-transparency

Zuckermann On connectint the dots - a response to Lessing Transparency
http://www.ethanzuckerman.com/blog/2009/10/12/on-connecting-the-dots-a-response-to-lessig-on-transparency/

 Which  could be the transparency collateral effects in European countries?



Eleonora Panto'
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_
http://www.puntopanto.it
http://it.globalvoicesonline.org
skype: epanto



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "eups20" group.
To post to this group, send email to eups20 at googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
eups20+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/eups20?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---




-- 
Jonathan Gray

Community Coordinator
The Open Knowledge Foundation
http://www.okfn.org