[okfn-discuss] Lucy and Jonathan: question re new Working Group pgs

[Kaitlyn (Kat) Braybrooke]

Sure. Speaking more about this in Berlin sounds like a good idea. I'll hold
off on the other groups until then!

Kat


| Kat Braybrooke*
*| Community Coordinator
| Open Knowledge Foundation, London UK
| Engage: http://okfn.org
| Tweet: http://twitter.com/@kat_braybrooke


On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>wrote:

> On 21 June 2011 23:19, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org> wrote:
> > Fully agree with all of this.
> >
> > Summary:
> >
> >  * Each WG needs a WP site e.g. science.okfn.org
> >  * Each WG needs a list of members e.g. science.okfn.org/members or
> > science.okfn.org/wg
> >  * Each WG needs a group e.g. okfn.org/groups/science
> >
> > Kat: lets discuss how we should proceed on this in Berlin.
> >
> > Here is the current full checklist that I propose we work from:
> >
> > http://jwyg.okfn.org/2011/06/12/what-should-every-working-group-have/
>
> Could we now move this to the revamped wiki?
>
> Rufus
>
> [...]
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/attachments/20110622/e152f039/attachment.html>