[okfn-discuss] Lucy and Jonathan: question re new Working Group pgs

Wed Jun 22 11:09:37 UTC 2011

Agreed. Lets do a big push to pull together documentation and put it
online when we meet. ;-)

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Kaitlyn (Kat) Braybrooke
<kat.braybrooke at okfn.org> wrote:
> Sure. Speaking more about this in Berlin sounds like a good idea. I'll hold
> off on the other groups until then!
>
> Kat
>
>
> | Kat Braybrooke
> | Community Coordinator
> | Open Knowledge Foundation, London UK
> | Engage: http://okfn.org
> | Tweet: http://twitter.com/@kat_braybrooke
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 21 June 2011 23:19, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org> wrote:
>> > Fully agree with all of this.
>> >
>> > Summary:
>> >
>> >  * Each WG needs a WP site e.g. science.okfn.org
>> >  * Each WG needs a list of members e.g. science.okfn.org/members or
>> > science.okfn.org/wg
>> >  * Each WG needs a group e.g. okfn.org/groups/science
>> >
>> > Kat: lets discuss how we should proceed on this in Berlin.
>> >
>> > Here is the current full checklist that I propose we work from:
>> >
>> > http://jwyg.okfn.org/2011/06/12/what-should-every-working-group-have/
>>
>> Could we now move this to the revamped wiki?
>>
>> Rufus
>>
>> [...]
>
>

-- 
Jonathan Gray

Community Coordinator
The Open Knowledge Foundation
http://blog.okfn.org

http://twitter.com/jwyg
http://identi.ca/jwyg