[okfn-discuss] [FC-discuss] A Free, Libre and Open Glossary
heath rezabek
heath.rezabek at gmail.com
Wed Jul 10 16:34:52 UTC 2013
I understand the debate a little better now. Another possibility is to
proactively promote Libre as a 'middle way', and just not entangle it with
the history of free/open debate.
This could even be more fruitful over time than trying to change the
entrenched connotations and definitions of either free or open. Libre
becomes a term for where the free/open debate perhaps should have ended up.
(But didn't.)
- Heath
On Wednesday, July 10, 2013, Bastien wrote:
> Hi Aaron and all,
>
> Aaron Wolf <wolftune at gmail.com <javascript:;>> writes:
>
> > Stef, you just posted on the Open Knowledge Foundation list a claim
> > that "Open" is specifically a suppression of ethics in favor of
> > business aims.
>
> Agreed with the rest of this email, but Stef's claim was about "open
> source", not "open".
>
> --
> Bastien
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org <javascript:;>
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
>
--
Heath Rezabek
Outreach & Collaborations Coordinator, Starship Congress
USA (512) 507-1101
hrezabek at icarusinterstellar.org
@starshipcongrss
<https://twitter.com/StarshipCongrss>starshipcongress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-discuss/attachments/20130710/17becb60/attachment.html>
More information about the okfn-discuss
mailing list