[okfn-discuss] White House Initiative - Open Data Policy

[Smarthart]

Open Notice is a call for all policy notices  and even mandatory physical signs (like a CCTV sign)  to have a representation digitally that can be linked.   This layer of open data is missing and mandated by law to be open.  

The biggest pain point at the moment for use and control of open data is around the in-accessibility of consent based notices, but this is but one type of a notice that should be open. 

Personally, I am also thinking of all the signs and building policies, or mandatory safety and security processes (small data) that have yet to be liberated and made useful.

What seems to be missing is a simple common structure and standard format for linking notices and signs together.  Does anyone know of any work in this area? 

Mark Lizar

On 13 May 2013, at 10:50, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org> wrote:

> Yes, it's really good :-) There was a summary post up on Friday:
> 
> http://blog.okfn.org/2013/05/10/government-data-open-and-machine-readable-by-default-announces-president-obama/
> 
> And we'll be following up with some further analysis. If folks have
> any thoughts very interested to hear them!
> 
> Rufus
> 
> On 13 May 2013 10:12, Smarthart <mark.lizar at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> MAKING OPEN AND MACHINE READABLE THE NEW DEFAULT FOR GOVERNMENT INFORMATION
>> 
>> http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/09/executive-order-making-open-and-machine-readable-new-default-government-
>> 
>> Lots of good stuff in here, like:
>> 
>> (b) Agencies shall implement the requirements of the Open Data Policy and
>> shall adhere to the deadlines for specific actions specified therein. When
>> implementing the Open Data Policy, agencies shall incorporate a full
>> analysis of privacy, confidentiality, and security risks into each stage of
>> the information lifecycle to identify information that should not be
>> released. These review processes should be overseen by the senior agency
>> official for privacy. It is vital that agencies not release information if
>> doing so would violate any law or policy, or jeopardize privacy,
>> confidentiality, or national security.
>> 
>> 
>> Very Kewl..
>> 
>> 
>> - Mark
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> okfn-discuss mailing list
>> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Rufus Pollock
> 
> Founder and Co-Director | skype: rufuspollock | @rufuspollock
> 
> The Open Knowledge Foundation
> 
> Empowering through Open Knowledge
> 
> http://okfn.org/ | @okfn | OKF on Facebook |  Blog  |  Newsletter
> 
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-discuss mailing list
> okfn-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-discuss